Betashares S&P/ASX Australian Technology ETF (ATEC.AX)

About Betashares S&P/ASX Australian Technology ETF

Betashares S&P/ASX Australian Technology ETF is a thematic ETF tracking the australian technology theme, holding 42 positions. This page values what the fund actually holds — a look-through discounted cash flow of every underlying company, weighted by fund weight — refreshed monthly. The management fee shown is the issuer's stated cost.

Holdings from the issuer's published file; prices and fundamentals from Yahoo Finance. General information only.

Betashares S&P/ASX Australian Technology ETF ATEC.AX

Australian technology · holdings as at 2026-08-31

ATEC.AX
AUD 22.75
Implied fair value
AUD 10.82
vs intrinsic value
-52% (premium)
Coverage
94%
Management fee
0.48%
Holdings
42

Look-through valuation

Betashares S&P/ASX Australian Technology ETF's holdings collectively trade 52% above their combined intrinsic value — an implied fair value of about AUD 10.82 versus AUD 22.75 today.

Based on 33 of 42 valued holdings, 94% of fund weight; 9 unvalued. 8th of 10 thematic ETFs by look-through value.

Priciest holding NOVONIX LTD-118% (premium)
Cheapest holding OFX GROUP LTD+69% (discount)

Holdings we can value top 15 by weight

WeightHoldingModelvs intrinsic value
10.6% COMPUTERSHARE LTD DCF -63% (premium)
10.4% XERO LTD DCF -55% (premium)
8.3% NEXTDC LTD EV/Sales -94% (premium)
8.3% CARSALES.COM LTD DCF +4% (discount)
7.8% PRO MEDICUS LTD DCF -75% (premium)
7.8% TECHNOLOGY ONE LTD DCF -50% (premium)
7.0% REA GROUP LTD DCF -41% (premium)
6.8% WISETECH GLOBAL LTD DCF -42% (premium)
4.4% CODAN LTD/AUSTRALIA DCF -75% (premium)
4.1% SEEK LTD DCF -73% (premium)
3.1% MEGAPORT LTD EV/Sales -26% (premium)
2.7% LIFE360 INC DCF -34% (premium)
1.4% DICKER DATA LTD DCF -53% (premium)
1.4% 4DMEDICAL LTD EV/Sales -60% (premium)
1.3% DATA#3 LTD DCF -75% (premium)

Remaining 18 valued holdings (8% of fund) collectively trade 39% above their combined intrinsic value.

What the fund holds

By sector

  • Information Technology 54.9%
  • Communication Services 19.5%
  • Industrials 10.8%
  • Healthcare 10.1%
  • Financials 4.7%

By country

  • Australia 100.0%

From the issuer's published holdings file.

How this is calculated

Each holding is valued with the same engine behind KashVector's DCF tool and its undervalued screens — a conservative 5-year discounted cash flow, or a dividend / excess-return model for banks, insurers and regulated utilities, or an EV/Sales comparison for a small tail the cash-flow models can't value. Where the DCF needs a forward growth rate we use the slower of a holding's multi-year revenue trend and its multi-year free-cash-flow trend, so one distorted year at one company can't skew the fund's number. Each holding's premium or discount to its own intrinsic value is weighted by fund weight and summed.

Read this as a measurement, not a verdict. The 5-year DCF is deliberately conservative on growth, so a premium is partly the model's own caution. Fast-growing and AI-exposed holdings in particular can read as heavily overvalued because a short-horizon cash-flow model can't capture a genuine platform shift or growth that currently shows up as investment rather than free cash flow. A fund can also trade above a conservative intrinsic value for years while compounding. A point-in-time snapshot as at 2026-09-01, highly sensitive to assumptions. Not financial advice.

Frequently asked questions

Does Betashares S&P/ASX Australian Technology ETF trade above or below the value of what it holds?

As at 2026-09-01, its holdings collectively trade 52% above their combined intrinsic value, over 94% of fund weight. A mechanical measurement, not advice.

Does a premium mean I should sell?

No. Nothing here is financial advice and it is never a buy, sell or hold call. A theme can trade above a conservative intrinsic value for a long time while still compounding.

Why do the tech / AI holdings read as so overvalued?

A 5-year discounted cash flow can't price a genuine platform shift, and it penalises companies whose growth currently shows up as capital investment rather than free cash flow. It reflects the model's limitation as much as the price.

How often is this updated?

Monthly. Holdings come from the issuer's published full-holdings file; prices and fundamentals are a monthly snapshot from Yahoo Finance, not a live feed.