Zip Co Limited (ZIP.AX)

Growth Stock Valuation · Financial Services · Credit Services

Valuation as at 2026-08-14

About Zip Co Limited

Zip Co Limited engages in the provision of digital retail finance, personal finance, and payments solutions in Australia and the United States. The company offers retail line of credit products and personal loans; retail installment products; and Buy Now Pay Later installment products to consumers. It also provides unsecured loans through banking partners, as well as online and in-store; and access to point-of-sale credit; and digital payment services.

Source: Yahoo Finance company profile · factual description, not KashVector commentary

Zip Co Limited ZIP.AX

Financial Services · Credit Services

Price
$2.76
Market Cap
$3.44B
Free Cash Flow
$4.9M
Revenue (TTM)
$1.22B
Revenue Growth
29.2%
Gross Margin
100.0%
Net Debt
$2.37B
52-Week Range
$1.38–$4.93

What does the current price assume?

At the current price, the market appears to be pricing in about 38.9% initial revenue growth — steep enough that the model's own free cash flow would dip before recovering by year 1, even though Zip Co Limited's actual free cash flow is already positive.

Zip Co Limited's trailing free cash flow is $4.9M on 29.2% current revenue growth today. The model's reinvestment charge scales with the assumed growth rate, not the company's actual current pace — funding 38.9% growth takes substantially more reinvestment than the business is really making right now, which is what pushes the modeled figure negative before it recovers.

Zip Co Limited's price & financial trends

Data as at 2026-08-14

Share price · last 2 years

$2.76 +15% vs 2024-08
ASX 200 $2.40$2.44$3.07$3.30$2.43$2.76 2024-082025-012025-062025-112026-042026-08

Revenue Per year

$1.07B +73% vs FY22
$620.0M$693.2M$868.0M$1.07BFY22FY23FY24FY25

Free cash flow Per year

$-69.3M +91% vs FY22
$-781.9M$-249.6M$255.1M$-69.3MFY22FY23FY24FY25

Operating margin trajectory Per year

25.1% +156% vs FY22
-45.0%0.5%26.0%25.1%FY22FY23FY24FY25

Growth Score

Good Fit3 of 5 criteria passed
Rule of 40 (Growth % + FCF Margin % >= 40)29.6%
Revenue Growth > 20%29.2%
Gross Margin > 50%100.0%
Cash Runway > 24 MonthsSkipped
Operating Margin Trajectory Improving-45.0% -> 25.1%
Dilution (Diluted Shares Growth) <= 10%/yr32.5%

Value investing scale · Buffett · Dalio · Graham

Partial Fit
11 / 17 combined score

See the full Buffett, Dalio & Graham breakdown for ZIP.AX →

The two models, in detail

Each shown with what it says the company is worth today and what growth the current price already implies — not just a single point estimate.

Multi-Stage DCF

$1.64
-40.7% margin of safety
Deeply Overvalued

EV / Sales

$1.04
-62.3% margin of safety
Deeply Overvalued
Implied EV/Sales at the current price: 4.76x (vs. today's reported 4.84x)

These numbers come from running Zip Co Limited's revenue and margin trajectory through the Multi-Stage DCF and EV/Sales formulas above — not from any view on the news, management, or ZIP.AX's competitive position. What is a multi-stage DCF?

Want to test your own growth, margin, or discount-rate assumptions?Open the full interactive calculator, pre-filled with ZIP.AX →

More ASX stocks we've valued

Not financial advice. Multi-Stage DCF and EV/Sales valuations are highly sensitive to assumptions — small changes in growth rate, target margin, or discount rate produce large swings in output. This is a mechanical calculation, not a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell.

About this valuation

Computed on 2026-08-14 from Yahoo Finance data, using the same engine as the full Growth Stock Evaluator. Every figure above is a point-in-time snapshot of that date — change any assumption yourself in the interactive tool for a live one.

Frequently asked questions

Is Zip Co Limited (ZIP.AX) undervalued?

The Multi-Stage DCF estimates intrinsic value at $1.64 vs a price of $2.76 on 2026-08-14. This is a mechanical output from a model with genuine assumptions built in (target margin, growth fade, reinvestment) — not advice.

What does "implied growth rate" mean?

It's the reverse question: instead of assuming a growth rate and computing a value, this holds every other assumption fixed and asks what initial revenue growth rate would make the model's value equal to today's actual price. It tells you what the market is already betting on, which you can then judge for plausibility yourself.